Practical wisdom for senior leaders navigating complexity. These posts explore the skills, mindsets, and practices that help executives lead with clarity, build trust, and create environments where people thrive.

“Humility is the most important quality in a leader. Being humble doesn’t mean to be passive. This is a difficult dichotomy to balance. But as with all the dichotomies–being strong, but not overbearing, for example–just the awareness of these two opposing forces becomes one of the most powerful tools at a leader’s disposal. Leaders must be humble enough to listen to new ideas, willing to learn strategic insights, and open to implementing new and better tactics and strategies. But a leader must also be ready to stand firm when there are clearly unintended consequences that negatively impact the mission and risk harm to the team.” The Dichotomy of Leadership, J. Willink and L. Babin.

Senior leaders talk about humility often. They want to be approachable, open‑minded, and willing to learn. At the same time, they need to project confidence, make high‑stakes decisions, and hold firm when it matters. The tension between humble leadership and strong executive presence can feel confusing: if you admit you don’t know, will people still trust you? If you stay open to others’ views, will you be seen as indecisive?​

In the Leadership Integrity Framework, humility lives at the intersection of Purpose, Presence, and Partnership—knowing your limits, showing up with grounded confidence, and relating to others with genuine curiosity.

Humility Is Not Low Self‑Esteem

Part of the confusion comes from how we use the word “humility.” Leaders sometimes mix it up with self‑doubt, passivity, or playing small.​

A useful way to differentiate:

  • Humility: Willingness to seek advice, listen to other points of view, and be open to changing your approach. You acknowledge both strengths and limits.
  • Low self‑esteem: Persistent lack of confidence in who you are and what you can do. You mostly see your flaws and rarely claim your strengths.​

Humble leaders recognize they are imperfect and still capable. Leaders with low self‑esteem see their imperfections as proof they do not belong. That difference matters for executive presence. Humility strengthens credibility; chronic self‑doubt erodes it.

What Humility Looks Like in Practice

True humility is not weakness. It requires enough inner stability that you don’t need constant validation to feel legitimate.​

In practice, humble leadership can look like:

  • Admitting when you were wrong—and correcting course without dramatizing it
  • Saying, “I don’t know yet, let me look into that,” instead of pretending to have all the answers
  • Acknowledging that someone else has the better idea, and championing it visibly
  • Staying open to feedback, even when it is uncomfortable or challenges your assumptions​

These behaviors draw directly on intellectual humility. As Adam Grant describes, intellectual humility is the capacity to stay curious instead of defensive, to search for what is true rather than what makes you feel right. For senior leaders, this is not a nice‑to‑have; it is a core competence in complex environments.​

From a Leadership Integrity perspective:

  • Purpose keeps you rooted in your values, so you can admit mistakes without losing your center.
  • Presence allows you to communicate “I don’t know” in a way that still feels steady and responsible.
  • Partnership turns humility into a relationship strength—others feel respected, heard, and invited into problem‑solving.

Do You Lose Confidence When You Admit You Don’t Know?

Many executives quietly fear that if they show uncertainty, their confidence will be questioned. They imagine that saying “I’m not sure yet” will undermine their authority or credibility with the board, their team, or key stakeholders.​

What people actually read as weak is not uncertainty; it is avoidance.

  • Dodging hard questions.
  • Offering vague answers to protect your image.
  • Defending an outdated position because changing your mind feels like failure.​

By contrast, saying “Here’s what we know, here’s what we don’t yet know, and here’s how we’ll find out” often increases trust. It demonstrates clarity, integrity, and a commitment to the work over ego. In other words, the combination of intellectual humility and clear next steps strengthens executive presence rather than diluting it.

The Goal: Confident and Open‑Minded

If you’ve just explored confidence, it can sound like humility asks you to swing to the opposite pole—to defer, stay quiet, and let others lead the way. That is not the invitation.​

The real work is balance:

  • Presenting confidently and staying open to being wrong.
  • Taking a clear stand and being curious about perspectives you have not yet considered.
  • Owning your expertise and recognizing it is incomplete without others’ insight.​

This is a vertical move: from “either I’m confident or I’m humble” to “I can be both confident and humble in the same conversation.” It is also where Purpose, Presence, and Partnership reinforce each other instead of pulling you in different directions.​

When leaders embody this balance, they quietly dismantle the myths that “confidence equals competence” and “humility equals ignorance.” They show that the most trustworthy leaders are often the ones willing to keep an open mind while still taking responsibility for the call.​

If you see yourself in this tension, notice your next meeting where you could practice both: state your view clearly, then ask one genuinely curious question that might change your mind.

*If you enjoyed this post, you may like my latest post on confidence.

Photo by Giulia Bertelli on Unsplash

“Lack of confidence kills more dreams than lack of ability. You’re capable of more than you think. Don’t be your own bottleneck.”

– James Clear

In senior leadership, confidence is rarely a simple “do I have it or not?” question. More often, it shows up as something subtler: second‑guessing your decisions, over‑editing your contributions in meetings, or worrying that if you speak too strongly, you will be perceived as arrogant. Many executives sit in this tension, wanting to be seen as confident leaders while quietly fearing they might be “too much.”​

In the Leadership Integrity Framework, confidence sits at the intersection of Purpose and Presence: knowing what you stand for and showing up in ways that reflect it. When those two dimensions drift apart, confidence either collapses inward into self‑doubt or inflates outward into something that feels like arrogance.

What Confident Leadership Actually Looks Like

When most people talk about confidence in leadership, they describe a feeling—an inner sense of steadiness or conviction. In practice, leadership confidence looks less like a feeling and more like a set of recognizable behaviors:​

  • Speaking up in difficult conversations and staying in the debate
  • Raising issues with senior stakeholders that others are reluctant to surface
  • Negotiating for what you genuinely believe you or your team deserves
  • Giving full credit to others without feeling diminished by their success

These expressions of confidence share a common thread: a leader who is anchored in their values and willing to stand behind their judgment. That is Presence—your internal clarity made visible through your choices, body language, and communication.

Confidence vs. Arrogance: Why They’re Not the Same

One of the most common concerns leaders bring into coaching is the fear of being perceived as too confident: too direct, too strong, too self‑assured. They have a mental image of the arrogant leader—dismissive, self‑referential, uninterested in feedback—and they want to avoid becoming that person at all costs.​

Here is the surprising truth: confidence and arrogance are not two points on the same line. They are closer to opposite poles.

  • Confidence is grounded in self‑respect and respect for others. It sounds like, “Here is my view, and I’m open to being wrong.”
  • Arrogance is grounded in insecurity and defensiveness. It sounds like, “Here is the view, and disagreement is a threat.”​

Genuine confidence is compatible with humility, curiosity, and learning. Arrogance is what happens when leaders use certainty to shield themselves from vulnerability, feedback, or shared accountability.​

From a Leadership Integrity Framework perspective, confidence is an aligned expression of Purpose and Presence—your inner compass and your outer behavior working together. Arrogance appears when Presence is cut off from Purpose: strong performance signals with little inner reflection or relational awareness.

How Relationship Patterns Shape Your Confidence

Underneath most “confidence issues” is not a personality flaw; it is a relational pattern. How you habitually relate to people directly shapes how confident you feel and how confident you appear.​

When leaders build relationships on:

  • Honesty and openness about what they see
  • Willingness to share opinions and invite others’ views
  • Genuine interest in feedback, even when it stings

…their authenticity does a lot of the confidence work for them. Colleagues experience them as grounded, approachable, and dependable, even when they are still developing in a new role.​

By contrast, when leaders relate from:

  • Conflict avoidance and a strong desire to “look good”
  • Guardedness and reluctance to show where they need support
  • Difficulty giving credit or receiving help

…their lack of transparency becomes their confidence problem. Others experience them as distant or self‑protective, which undermines both trust and executive presence.​

This is where the Partnership dimension of the framework comes in. Confidence is not only an internal state; it is relational. How you connect, listen, and respond to others either amplifies or erodes your felt sense of confidence.​

How to Build Confident Leadership Without Losing Humility

The good news is that leadership confidence is not a fixed trait. It can be developed through intentional, research‑aligned practices that integrate Purpose, Presence, and Partnership.​

You can start with three concrete moves:

  • Deepen your self‑awareness.
    Explore your values, triggers, and habitual stories about your own capability. Notice where “I’m not ready” has become a default narrative rather than a data‑based assessment. Reflect on questions like: When do I actually feel most grounded in my leadership? Where do I reliably under‑estimate myself?​
  • Practice brave vulnerability.
    Identify specific areas where you need support or perspective and name them explicitly. Asking for help does not weaken your authority; it signals maturity, self‑knowledge, and commitment to the work over ego. As Jocko Willink and Leif Babin note, confident leaders elevate others, encourage them to step up, and push praise down the line rather than hoarding it.​
  • Audit how you show up in relationships.
    Watch your micro‑behaviors: Do you celebrate colleagues’ wins without qualification? Do you listen to feedback with genuine openness rather than immediate defense? Are you willing to say, “I got this wrong,” without collapsing into self‑criticism?​

Leaders who work at this integration often describe feeling more quietly assured. Their confidence becomes less about projecting certainty and more about staying consistent with who they are and how they want to lead.

The Heart of Confident Leadership

If you want to build sustainable, authentic confidence, start with how you relate to yourself and to others.​

  • Purpose clarifies what you stand for.
  • Presence communicates that clarity in a way others can feel.
  • Partnership ensures your confidence strengthens relationships rather than constricting them.​

In the end, nothing signals real confidence more than an open mind and an open heart.

Photo by Amandine Lerbscher on Unsplash